It is typical of the hubris of us individual humans and our individual human societies to always imagine that we alone are big and mighty and wise and that all other beings are small, weak and foolish.
A further human hubris of ours is to imagine how better our imagined Utopia would be when all the other, lesser/weaker/smaller forms of life have been liquidated, if need be with with extreme prejudice.
But germicides won't ever remove all the germs anymore than insecticides will ever remove all insects or eugenicides will ever remove all the weak, frail and elderly.
The various forces of Nature combine to interact upon all beings in various ways depending on scale, because each individual scale works over a particular - limited - spatial and energy scale.
Reality , the Reality of matter and energy , is thus permanently stratified into different layers or scale levels.
From the point of view of possible lifeforms, that means a variety of scale-defined niches that are permanently ("eternally") available for the lifeform best sized to excel in them.
Translation : kill off all bacteria sized life and some new life the same size will emerge to fill in that hole of opportunity.
Humans are currently the "fittest" for our big niche but we are not "fit" for all niches, though we continue to delude ourselves into thinking so.
Niches change constantly at the margins so all successful lifeforms display a variety of members, some who appear to be weak and useless, but in fact this merely an evolutionary way to ensure enough variety in the lifeform's generic material to surmount unexpected changes in their chosen niche.
For example , people with a moderate form of the disease of sickle cell anemia survive some insect-vectored diseases better than supposedly healthier people, at least in the many large regions of the world where these insects and diseases are endemic.
The big and the small lifeforms may never grow to like each other or cooperate with each other, but they might as well resign themselves that the big and the small, like the rich and the poor, will always be with us.
Henry Dawson grew to understand the profoundness of the concept of "eternal commensality of the big and the small" in his studies of human-oral commensal strep bacteria interactions.
That is why he was so damn adamant that even winning WWII couldn't come at the cost of tromping all over the weak and the small....
Showing posts with label eugenics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label eugenics. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Friday, December 28, 2012
Penicillin : from Modern to ante-Modern in six bloody years
The biggest battle of WWII was NOT Stalingrad ( physically huge but intellectually a mere bun fight between History's worst dictators) but rather the battle over wartime penicillin : who makes it and who receives it.
For WWII definitely had a 'war within a war' aspect to it .
The billions of individuals who made up the modern global civilization of 1939 had six long - bloody - years to re-evaluate whether the core values of their culture were really worth dying for, or were they only good for starting aggressive wars - but not the sort of values for ending aggressive wars and securing permanent peace.
The New York World's Fair of 1939 promised a total world of man-made-ness but in the case of penicillin, man-made-ness ended in abject failure and it was Mother Nature that brought us this wonder drug when Man proved to be 'not up for the job'.
The world of 1939 eugenically exalted the Big and the Mighty and denigrated the weak and the small : penicillin (once it was a perfectly pure crystal shining brighter than a thousand suns) would be distributed on strictly Darwinian lines.
It would not be made in such quantities that would require the Allies to make one less bomber or battleship : so it would have to be rationed and so would go only to the eugenically 1A people .
(Be they fighting in foreign combat lines or winning the war behind some important desk in London or Washington.)
But by 1945, those same bombers were being pulled off their jobs of riding shotgun over the NRA nation and converted into butterflies to deliver life-saving grams of Nature-made penicillin to the dying all over the world : regardless of age, color, gender and economic status.
1945 was indeed the year that baby "Baby Boomers" started entering a very new , ante-Modern world......
For WWII definitely had a 'war within a war' aspect to it .
The billions of individuals who made up the modern global civilization of 1939 had six long - bloody - years to re-evaluate whether the core values of their culture were really worth dying for, or were they only good for starting aggressive wars - but not the sort of values for ending aggressive wars and securing permanent peace.
The New York World's Fair of 1939 promised a total world of man-made-ness but in the case of penicillin, man-made-ness ended in abject failure and it was Mother Nature that brought us this wonder drug when Man proved to be 'not up for the job'.
The world of 1939 eugenically exalted the Big and the Mighty and denigrated the weak and the small : penicillin (once it was a perfectly pure crystal shining brighter than a thousand suns) would be distributed on strictly Darwinian lines.
It would not be made in such quantities that would require the Allies to make one less bomber or battleship : so it would have to be rationed and so would go only to the eugenically 1A people .
(Be they fighting in foreign combat lines or winning the war behind some important desk in London or Washington.)
But by 1945, those same bombers were being pulled off their jobs of riding shotgun over the NRA nation and converted into butterflies to deliver life-saving grams of Nature-made penicillin to the dying all over the world : regardless of age, color, gender and economic status.
1945 was indeed the year that baby "Baby Boomers" started entering a very new , ante-Modern world......
Sunday, September 30, 2012
"Race",before DNA, was BLOOD : literally. The hidden subtext behind penicillin's 15 year delay.
![]() |
| BLOOD was destiny, before DNA |
Their blood - that gooey red stuff - not Genes and not DNA.
"Blood" Eugenics has been re-written out of History
Don't let today's geneticists try and re-write history ---- the laws did not talk about genes or chromosomes ---- they said blood and they meant it.
In WWII, the great American Red Cross, won't let black blood pollute the lily pure blood of white folk even in transfusions to save a life.
No talk from the Red Cross of genes or DNA ---- blood.
The thought of sticking impure mold slime juice into white people's bloodstreams so sickened almost all middle class doctors between 1928 and what - 2028 ? , that they'd rather let their patient die than give them life-saving natural penicillin.
Don't ever forget the 6 million the Nazis killed of the Jews - or the 30 million dead from other groups as well - but give a thought to the Holocaust of people who might have lived out normal lives, if only hundreds of thousands of doctors had done with impure, dirty, crude, natural penicillin what Doctors Martin Henry Dawson and James Duhig did with it : save lives.
Penicillin didn't really start saving lives until 15 years after it was first discovered ---- using the same primitive level of technology in 1943 as was rejected in 1928 : what changed wasn't the technology but the moral character of the doctors involved : from 9-5 benchwarmer doctors and racist eugenic doctors to highly moral, driven, humanists....
1940's ISOLATIONISTS abandoned Europe's 4Fs and America's 4Fs
![]() |
| 1A = 53% |
Then in the Fall of 1940, these same Isolationists, using the excuse of preparing for an European war - a war that they were actually working all out to avoid - pushed for an abandonment of Social Medicine , in favour of War Medicine.
Translation of this hypocrisy ?
In Eugenics-speak, this meant abandoning efforts to provide medical care to both the well-to-do 1As and the poorer 4Fs, in favour of research on making the 1As into better fighters.
Rooseveltcare as unpopular then as Obamacare is today
Actually, the Isolationists had high hopes that America's 1As would never have to fight : this was all just an excuse to roll back the clock on providing care for the 47% in 1940s America.
Rooseveltcare was no more popular then among the well-to-do than Obamacare is today. (Or Romneycare was in Boston a few years ago - but that is another story altogether isn't Mitt ?)
It was this Isolationist hypocrisy that I believe pushed Martin Henry Dawson over the edge into his all out effort to rescue some American 4Fs (his equivalent of 1915's Belgians), with 4F natural - impure- penicillin, as his rebuke to uncaring America.....
Republicans: ABORTING the 47%, before they are born, will greatly reduce the federal deficit
![]() |
| ABORT the 47% ??? |
But tomorrow, some of the surviving 53% might also be down and hence would also be written off, in ever new rounds of 'tough love'.
Regarding 'the down and out' as permanently down is like a circular firing squad
In this numbers game, after a series of round of recessions and booms, very few people would be left in America, period - either to pay federal taxes or simply to breath free.
If Hitler had won the war and the world, the Nazis would have had round after round of purification trials, till almost nobody would be left alive - sort of like the Russian Politburo under Stalin or what happened in the last days of the French Revolution.
Purity and perfection tests never end, never are satisfied.
Ditto for Romney and Ryan who, unknowingly, are both advocates of seeing the world through the unvarying spectacles of the K-selecting eugenicist.
The world, to the K-selecting eugenicist, is simple, predictable and static.
In their view of world ecology, the whole world is one big niche, yesterday-today-tomorrow , and their job is to find the beings that best fill that permanent niche and discard the rest.
Commensalists, such as myself, feel differently : call us r-selecting types.
We don't believe in putting our eggs and sperm in one basket.
We see the world as dynamic and unpredictable, always changing.
See it filled with many constantly changing niches that are only partially and temporally filled by many different types of beings: we welcome diversity and feel it to be the best protection possible against tomorrow's unexpected massive changes.
We are not at all surprised to learn that some "pure-blooded" aboriginal tribes were almost totally wiped out by something like childhood measles, with the only survivors being a few "half-breeds", the children of tribe members who married Europeans with built-in resistance to measles.
We prefer to think of them as displaying hybrid resilience, not half-breed decadence, and we think the hard scientific evidence to prove it is on OUR side.
Romney's soaring political rhetoric sounds so good but it is based on outmoded, incorrect, science and when it collides with physical reality, it will always crash and burn....
Monday, September 24, 2012
Aktion 47% : saving the 4Fs in a time of the 1As , putting them back to work and paying taxes : the OTHER Manhattan project
![]() |
| Romneycare DEATH PANELS for the 47% |
Also in the 1941 medical gutter were the "4Fs of the 4Fs", those young men dying of invariable fatal SBE, seen as consuming precious medical resources at a time when many in the medical elite thought that the sole medical priority should be war medicine for the fit 1As.
Think of today's Mitt Romney as 1941's Dr Romney, if you aren't getting the picture yet.
But somebody - a nobody - in Manhattan had a different idea.
He thought both "unfits" (penicillin and the SBEs) could be redeemed, pulled out of that illusionary gutter, and put back to work combatting the Nazi evil.
For the Nazi evil included not just tanks and subs but also Aktion 4T : a scheme to kill all Germans ( and later everybody) who were judged not productive enough to bother having around .
Romneycare "death panels"
It is hard to tell just how many people would have ultimately have ended up dead in Romneycare styled "death panels", if the demands of the war for all forms of labour hadn't intervened.
Who knows , perhaps as many as 47%.
The nobody's plan was a sort of Aktion 4F.
It was to be a rebuttal to the Nazi Aktion T-4 .
And a rebuttal as well as to his own 1A eugenically obsessed colleagues, like Dr Foster Kennedy who suggested killing the unfit young in that same year, 1941, to a wide round of applause.
Think of it as "the other wartime Manhattan Project" : saving the 4Fs of the 4Fs at the very height of an all out obsession with 1As.
Think of it, perhaps, as the most profound rebuttal to everything Hitler stood for : it said, even in war, we Allies care ( or should care) about the least of the these, as well as the wise and the mighty.
So that nobody - Dr Martin Henry Dawson - put penicillin to work and soon his medical notes happily recorded that many of his SBE patients had indeed gotten up from their deathbeds and had gone back to work , paying taxes.
Hitler preferred killing people with such diseases outright ( see Martin Bader for an example) while the American medical elite in the 1940s and the American political elite in the 2010s, prefers to let them die quietly offstage, by neglect. The outcome is broadly the same.
Morally, it is only a short slippery slide from a fundraiser in Boca Raton to the death camps at Auschwitz....
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
As a EUGENICIST, Romney exceeds even Hitler , who never thought 47% of Germans were 'unfit'
![]() |
| the UNFIT vote democrat |
The other half of us pay no federal taxes and are the takers, the moochers, the dependents,the self-defined victims, Nature's 'unfit.'
Victorian 'culture wars' re-emerge into 21st century presidential election
Out in the real world, before Victorians brought in sentimental campaigns to protect children, slaves, women and animals, these 'unfit' would die a short and natural death.
But now soft-headed (Democrat) governments have kept this half of us alive artificially --- under Romney all this would change.
But some years, perhaps even Romney fits into these 'unfit' ---as in some years he too may have paid no taxes.
I don't know this for a fact admittably, but I am hardly alone in strongly suspecting it, if only from his most electorally costly decision: the decision NOT to reveal his past income tax returns.
But there is another view of Darwin and Herbert Spencer that doesn't throw out their baby with the bathwater: it is this that "the fittest will survive".
OOOOOOH !!! Did I say a bad thing ?
I don't think so and here is why:
'Fit' or 'fittest' : what's the difference ?
A tiny jockey doesn't seem particularly 'fit' versus a football quarterback but try to 'fit' that quarterback on the backside of a horse in a horserace and we begin to see that while the term 'fit' (and hence un-fit) is static, permanent and eternal, the term 'fittest' is highly contingent and varies from time to time and place to place.
In a world of the First Law (of thermodynamics), the fit will survive : it is stable and permanent and static.
But if the world is better described by the Second Law (of thermodynamics) and is is in constant and dynamic and chaotic change, then sometimes and somewhere , the small and the small eaters (those frequently judged unfit) will actually often do much better than the big and big eater.
Fantasy says that "God is on the side of the battalions of the biggest eaters", but the Earth's long history, grounded in ancient dead giant dinosaur bones and huge healthy present day populations of tiny bacteria, suggests otherwise.
Blue Sky fantasy or Grounded reality : no guess as to which world Mr Romney drinks the Kool-Aid in.....
Saturday, June 2, 2012
"Three Generations of JEWISH Cowards Is Enough"
Part Two of Two Posts on this issue
Since 1945 (and the revelations about the Holocaust and what Jews in the free world failed to do to stop it) a disproportional percentage of every country's well known controversial columnists have been of Jewish descent.
At first glance, it may appear that the children and grandchildren of that generation of free world Jews who failed to ACT UP or OCCUPY WALL STREET during WWII, are simply being very confrontational and controversial now, in a catch-up effort to negate the meek and mildness of their forefathers' generation.
I argue this is simply not so.
While the voters are usually pretty evenly divided between voting for parties of the left/green or the right/libertarians ,well known Jewish controversial columnists are not evenly divided left and right in their viewpoints.
Most of them, by far, are very right wing and write for very right wing media.
In doing so, they are merely carrying on an old family tradition: being as cowardly today, as their forefathers were during WWII.
The WWII generation of free world Jews was determined not to undermine what little they had already achieved in the anti-Semitic democracies of the Allies, by being seen as loud ,public, pushy and 'Jewish' in expressing their concerns over the fate of Europe's Jews.
"The way to get ahead is to get along" (work quietly,politely) was their motto.
This even when it was well known, by ordinary members of the Gentile community, that millions of Jews, polish and russian, were already dead at Nazi hands by the Spring of 1942 ----- before the infamous mass gassings began.
Brown-nosers, Jewish brown-nosers.
And their hard-hitting, opinionated, controversial children and grandchildren ?
Still Jewish brown-nosers: like grandfather, like grandson.
Courage then is what it would have taken to get yourself arrested by chaining yourself to the White House walls protesting inaction on the fate of Europe's Jews.
Courage today, for a columnist, might simply consist of writing in a trade union newspaper while defending the rich and assailing the poor - or by assailing the rich and defending the poor in a rich man's newspaper.
But defending the rich and assailing the poor and minorities in the rich man's media isn't brave or even controversial - it is called brown-nosing, or if you wish to go upmarket, being a 'HO' for Pay.
Doubt me ? Ask yourself how many of the well known controversial columnists of Jewish origin airily dismissed ACT UP ("homos") or OCCUPY WALL STREET("eco-criminals") calls for acts of civil disobedience ?
Grandpa did not approve of PETER BERGSON's calls for acts of civil disobedience during WWII and his gutless grandchildren are just carrying on his tradition.
When Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr ruled that "three generations of imbeciles is enough" in the case of BUCK versus BELL, legitimizing eugenics in America and in Nazi Germany ,he was wrong on both the facts of the case and on its morality.
I am not wrong on either in this case: "three generations of Jewish cowards is more than enough".
Civilian courage in non-combat zones during WWII might consist of stealing government-issue penicillin in an effort to save the lives of the poor, deliberately sentenced to death by neglect by that same government. The courageous Dr Martin Henry Dawson did just that - I know the courageous --- and Jewish brown-nosers you ain't it.
So - please ! - bugger off the pages of our newspapers and screens of our TV and do something truly courageous before you dare to show your brown-nosed faces around here again.....
Since 1945 (and the revelations about the Holocaust and what Jews in the free world failed to do to stop it) a disproportional percentage of every country's well known controversial columnists have been of Jewish descent.
At first glance, it may appear that the children and grandchildren of that generation of free world Jews who failed to ACT UP or OCCUPY WALL STREET during WWII, are simply being very confrontational and controversial now, in a catch-up effort to negate the meek and mildness of their forefathers' generation.
I argue this is simply not so.
While the voters are usually pretty evenly divided between voting for parties of the left/green or the right/libertarians ,well known Jewish controversial columnists are not evenly divided left and right in their viewpoints.
Most of them, by far, are very right wing and write for very right wing media.
In doing so, they are merely carrying on an old family tradition: being as cowardly today, as their forefathers were during WWII.
The WWII generation of free world Jews was determined not to undermine what little they had already achieved in the anti-Semitic democracies of the Allies, by being seen as loud ,public, pushy and 'Jewish' in expressing their concerns over the fate of Europe's Jews.
"The way to get ahead is to get along" (work quietly,politely) was their motto.
This even when it was well known, by ordinary members of the Gentile community, that millions of Jews, polish and russian, were already dead at Nazi hands by the Spring of 1942 ----- before the infamous mass gassings began.
Brown-nosers, Jewish brown-nosers.
And their hard-hitting, opinionated, controversial children and grandchildren ?
Still Jewish brown-nosers: like grandfather, like grandson.
Courage then is what it would have taken to get yourself arrested by chaining yourself to the White House walls protesting inaction on the fate of Europe's Jews.
Courage today, for a columnist, might simply consist of writing in a trade union newspaper while defending the rich and assailing the poor - or by assailing the rich and defending the poor in a rich man's newspaper.
But defending the rich and assailing the poor and minorities in the rich man's media isn't brave or even controversial - it is called brown-nosing, or if you wish to go upmarket, being a 'HO' for Pay.
Doubt me ? Ask yourself how many of the well known controversial columnists of Jewish origin airily dismissed ACT UP ("homos") or OCCUPY WALL STREET("eco-criminals") calls for acts of civil disobedience ?
Grandpa did not approve of PETER BERGSON's calls for acts of civil disobedience during WWII and his gutless grandchildren are just carrying on his tradition.
When Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr ruled that "three generations of imbeciles is enough" in the case of BUCK versus BELL, legitimizing eugenics in America and in Nazi Germany ,he was wrong on both the facts of the case and on its morality.
I am not wrong on either in this case: "three generations of Jewish cowards is more than enough".
Civilian courage in non-combat zones during WWII might consist of stealing government-issue penicillin in an effort to save the lives of the poor, deliberately sentenced to death by neglect by that same government. The courageous Dr Martin Henry Dawson did just that - I know the courageous --- and Jewish brown-nosers you ain't it.
So - please ! - bugger off the pages of our newspapers and screens of our TV and do something truly courageous before you dare to show your brown-nosed faces around here again.....
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Janus Manhattan
but it is still the world's most important
city.
The most power-filled city on Earth but
the most hope-filled city as well.
Home to Wall Street and Ellis Island.
Organizational birthplace of Eugenics and
home to more Jews than any other city on the planet.
The world's biggest life-ender was birthed here, as was the world's smallest (and best) lifesaver -- at the exact same time in history, in the same small neighbourhood.
The little boy and baby patricia both were born here.
Epicenter of an inhumanly endless megalopolis stretching from Portland Maine to Richmond Virginia, it is also home to hundreds of tiny ,distinctive, fiercely independent neighbourhoods.
Janus Manhattan.
The rest of the world is forced to function as any illiterate must, to become very very good at reading the face of this inscrutable giant, because the continued existence of our planet might depend on our skill at reading it correctly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




